HOW BIG
DiscoverComparisons

Putting sizes in perspective

Bonding wire and hair: comparing two diameters

The adopted hair reference is 70 micrometres in diameter, compared with 25 micrometres for the gold bonding wire: about 2.8 times. Both compared dimensions are diameters; the drawn wire’s length is not part of the calculation.

Human hair: a dimension about 2.8 times that of Gold bond wire using the adopted values.

Try this comparison

Is a chip’s bonding wire thinner than a hair?

Dimensions adopted for the calculation
ReferenceDimension
Gold bond wire25 µm
representative diameter ≈ 25 µm
Human hair70 µm
Representative diameter

Calculation: 70 µm ÷ 25 µm, after conversion into the same unit. The ratio calculated from the catalogue data is about 2.8.

Both illustrations use a common factor for the stated dimension. Positions aid reading and do not represent physical separation.

Real hair varies widely, and not all bonding wires have this diameter. The illustration frames a wire segment to make its thickness readable; its diameter remains at the same scale as the hair’s.

Check the conventions

Gold bond wire

Varies by periodGeneric manufacture

Wire bonding connects tiny contacts using very fine metal wires. A diameter of about 25 µm is a common example, not a minimum or a value shared by all components. Here only the wire's thickness is to scale; its horizontal length is shortened and symbolic.

Rounded technical example; the linked source was not consulted in this session, and the value has not been individually audited.

Human hair

Hair thickness varies greatly between individuals. Displayed dimension: representative diameter.

Catalogue value to check against the source; not individually audited.

Choose another reference

Replace an object in the explorer, keep the common scale factor and try predicting the new ratio before reading it.

Open the comparison →